Progressive Approach to Practicing: HS Wind Ensemble’s Peer Evaluations

Every music director has made the following exclamation either out loud or silently while lying awake at night: “Our ensemble needs to experience playing music together after all notes and rhythms have been mastered.” Why? This is when the magic of playing music together happens. We want our students to experience how the joy and art of collective music-making is taken to a heightened state when our minds no longer need to be concerned with “what note is that?” or “how does that rhythm go?” What’s more, when students can play their music effortlessly we can put our energy towards exploring and practicing the many nuances necessary for bringing the music to life. Too often directors and students spend their valuable class time going over things that should be tackled before or after a rehearsal.

LREI’s HS Wind Ensemble is no exception. Given the full and busy lives of most HS students, practicing and preparing our music for rehearsals often goes unattended. I challenged the musicians to have mastered three pieces from our repertoire by a certain date. The year to date has been a great one in terms of student participation and excitement for our music. However, I was particularly struck by how unaffected most students seem with not knowing their parts even many weeks after having the music.

IMG_1042

 

At a recent rehearsal I challenged students to come to class knowing their music not for me but instead for each other. Our group is made up of wonderfully conscientious young people who if they saw a classmate in need would not hesitate to lend a helpful hand or a thoughtful word. Yet, playing wrong notes amongst their peers class after class doesn’t seem to phase them. I asked them to see this unpreparedness as “not having their friend’s back” if he or she were in need.  “You’re actually letting down those students who did put in the practice time and are prepared,” I said.

I set the deadline for mastery as a way of stating my expectations. However, when it came time to evaluate them something did not seem right about me asking them to demonstrate their mastery to me. After all I had made an impassioned request for them to do this for each other. Instead, I asked each student evaluate a peer.

IMG_1049

Working in pairs students were required to perform sections of our music while their peer evaluated the performance. The peer evaluator had to make a final recommendation as to wether or not that student had reached a sufficient level of mastery–enough to take part in our next rehearsal. My hope is that students will begin to have the same expectations for each other when it comes to practicing our music as I have for them.
IMG_1040

 

As I checked in on each pair I could sense a level of communication and bonding that indicated the kids were enjoying the process.  As I could have predicted they were going about their evaluations compassionately and with a true sense of helpfulness.

“Rachel is awesome!” exclaimed Mei.   “I didn’t know you had such a hard part,” I heard one student say to another.

IMG_1052

 

By the end of class students were excitedly handing in their evaluation forms chattering about how good their peers sounded.  I’m excited to see if the connection made between each student raises the preparedness level that each student feels they need to maintain. Stay tuned!

3 thoughts on “Progressive Approach to Practicing: HS Wind Ensemble’s Peer Evaluations”

  1. Nice going, Matt. I can remember sometimes being this music student in high school: overwhelmed with various assignments, relying on my naturally musical ear, and sometimes being uninspired by the challenge of practicing alone. Since practice outside of the group’s rehearsals is done almost 100% individually, it can often be isolating and frustrating. The fun part of playing with an ensemble is just that: playing with an ensemble. Performing with an ensemble is even better, but no one wants to embarrass themselves during a performance.

    A football team would never intentionally show up to a game unprepared and then get humiliated in front of their family and friends on the field.

    It sounds like the goal is the same across disciplines: Putting in individual hard work pays off for the team. And if the team holds each other accountable and inspires each other, perhaps that is just what they need.

    Having peers evaluate each other is close to someone holding up a mirror to themselves. If they are occasional shocked or dismayed by what appears in the mirror, hopefully the encouragement and respect from their peers will settle in and serve as the necessary inspiration they all need for them to head down the road of personal accountability- which then leads towards the joy and pride of performing as an ensemble.

    Good luck and keep us posted!

    1. This is great, Matt. I wonder, to use Dave’s language, what students holding each other accountable would look like in other disciplines. What might the mathematical version of a peer evaluation be? What might be the elements of a mathematical “performance” that go deeper than recitation?

  2. Matt, thank for taking the risk to try something in class and to post as a follow up to our “what if” faculty meeting and Dave thanks for commenting.

    I think that this idea of shared accountability and support around achieving key benchmarks is one more way that we can create space for student voice, which was also a theme that resonated across the “what if” questions. It will be interesting to see if this approach helps to create among the students a greater sense of shared purpose in the ensemble.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *