What is a school community to do…

Dear LREI Community,

I hope that this note finds you well, having enjoyed the four-day Fall Weekend. The staff had an enlightening professional day last Friday, focusing on implicit bias in our work with each other and with our students. Our discussions were related to our reading of Blindspot: Hidden Biases of Good People by Anthony Greenwald and Mahzarin Banaji. I highly recommend it to you. At yesterday morning’s discussion of the school’s class placement policy we also mentioned Whistling Vivaldi And Other Clues to How Stereotypes Affect Us by Claude M. Steele; also recommended. Thank you to those who attended our two open meetings, also very enlightening.

Over the past week or so there have been on-again / off-again conversations about the Supreme Court nomination hearings and the so-many issues that have bubbled out of them. Clearly, most of these conversations have taken place with the older students and, in all likelihood, will continue in the coming weeks and months as the issues are important and complex, take time to examine, and are found in many areas of our lives.

I spent a few minutes yesterday sharing the school’s new sexual misconduct/harassment policies with the high school students. I wanted to make sure the students know where to find the policies on LREI Connect, to speak a little about the fact that the policies are largely student written, and to talk about the procedures outlined in the policies. It is always a pleasure to be with our high school students. They were attentive and, while there were only a few, their questions were quite thoughtful. As our conversation ended, I noted that the hard work will come next, working with the teachers and others to create a “culture of consent” and to investigate what this means and how we can foster such a thing. Hard work but certainly a task of which our students, all students for that matter, are capable. My time with the students reminded me of something I had read in Wednesday morning’s New York Times, in a letter to the editor written by noted sexuality and health educator Deborah M. Roffman. She wrote:

The “boys will be boys” stereotype certainly gives license for boys to disrespect, devalue and mistreat girls, but deeper analysis of it also reveals the fundamentally demeaning ways in which we think about boys.

I often ask adults and students what words come to mind when they hear this phrase. The characteristics they list are overwhelmingly negative. (Curiously, they often also mention “in charge” and “leaders”: No matter how “bad” boys and men might be, apparently they’re still entitled to run the show.)
 
Teaching boys to “respect girls” as an antidote to mistreating them actually misses the point. First, we must own the harm we do all boys by setting the bar for their character and behavior so low, as if they don’t have what it takes to behave well and be held accountable. Only when we begin to treat boys with the kind of respect they deserve will they develop the self-respect they need to raise the bar for themselves. And people who respect themselves are much less likely to mistreat others.  

So what is a school community to do?  We must continue to have the conversations that we already have, adding more of the same and some new ones into the mix. We have to work towards creating the aforementioned culture of consent. We have to talk about the ways it is hard to be a girl or woman – the systemic, accepted, public harassment and abuse that is so embedded in our culture, and how we can become a more supportive, righteous community. We have to talk about the ways it is hard to be a boy (and I don’t mean the ways in which being a man is hard that were mentioned after last week’s hearings, that men and boys are being held to an unfair standard, that common “boys will be boys” behaviors are to be excused).  I refer to the fact that there are stereotypes of masculinity that are quite harmful to boys and men, for example; what can we do to avoid being part of this problem. We also have to move out of the binary “girl and boy” paradigm and look at ways that sex, attraction, power, and other factors make relationships and interactions complex and challenging for all, no matter how one identifies, and how these relationships can also be thrilling and wonderful.

So much to do, so many essential conversations in which to engage. We will have these in school and we would love to hear about similar discussions you have at home. We have much to learn from each other.

 

Comments are closed.