- Learn about topics that matter to me personally
- Learn about myself, my identity, and my place in the world
- Build my relationship with my peers
- See new perspectives and develop empathy
- Use my creativity
Author: Jemma
Period Con, 11/18/17
Last weekend we attended Period Con, there were many panels and speakers and we met a lot of activists that work to make sure everyone who menstruates get menstrual products and they are also working to demolish the taboo around menstruating and the “tampon tax.” One very interesting panel addressed that some men menstruate because they might be trans or might not identify with a gender but they are biological a woman so they have to menstruate. So a few things I learned from that panel was that first, we can refer to them as feminine hygiene products because not only women use them and also when referring to them a hygiene it implies that it is dirty and needs to be cleaned as opposed to just staying clean. So the correct term to refer to them as is “menstrual products.” I felt that the event was very empowering and seeing all of the people there who thought that this was an important issue was amazing. And hearing how people addressed the area that was usually ignored was awesome. I wish that I could be as amazing as the women there. I think that Period Con jump-started our group to get a lot done. Because we met so many amazing people and organizations that it really helped us. Through period con we also got an interview with YouTuber Ingrid Nilsen who uses her youtube to be an activist for periods. Period Con was just an amazing experience overall and I am so honored that I got to become a part of it.
Photo Shop Intro Project
In my design you have pattern because there are 2 men in different positions in clothing but the point of the 2 of them in consitency. There is also contrast because of the monotone and duotone so the sign and the men and the cast are all darker and the rest of it is lighter to create contrast. There is proportion and scale because all of the different masks and things in the original picture are different sizes. There is movement because from the men you can tell they are in the middle of an action so they are moving even if it is a frozen image. The playbill shows emphasis because it shows what the picture is about you can tell the playbill is closer and because all of the other main parts are in black and white you can tell the playbill is the most important.
Crucible Comparative Essay Outline Template
Name:Jemma Humanities
7th Grade Comparative Essay
Outline for Crucible/McCarthy Comparative Essay
Theme: Scapegoating .
Paragraph #1: Introductory Paragraph (GIT)
Grabber Statement (G):
Imagine being put on the stand for a superstitious crime that you did not commit with your life on the line. Do you confess for your life and ruin your reputation or stay pure and be executed? There have been many instances in America’s history where many innocent people have been denied freedom and have been dehumanized by certain individuals’ selfish plans for more power. This is scapegoating.
Introduction of Theme (I):
Innocent people all throughout our country’s history have been unfairly scapegoated. It started when Abby and the afflicted girls accused many random and innocent people in the town of Salem, Massachusetts. Then it happened again when Joseph McCarthy scapegoated hundreds of people of being communists, and in present day Donald Trump is scapegoating Muslims of being terrorists by banning them from entering the country. These individuals used scapegoating to gain more power and attention. History really does repeat itself.
Thesis Statement (T):
All throughout history innocent people have been scapegoated and marginalized unjustly in certain people’s effort for more power.
____________________________________________________________________________________
Paragraph #2: Crucible Thematic Connection
Topic Sentence (T):
Abby and the afflicted girls scapegoat many people in the town of Salem for selfish gain, which usually costs innocent people their lives.
Explanatory Sentence (E):
Abby scapegoats Tituba as the first of many in the play. She does this in an effort for power and to take blame off herself. The following quote shows Abby telling everyone that Tituba is in league with the devil.
Evidence (E):
“HALE, grasping Abigail : Abigail, it may be your cousin is dying. Did you call the Devil last night?
ABIGAIL: I never called him! Tituba, Tituba …
PARRIS, blanched: She called the Devil?
HALE: I should like to speak with Tituba
PARRIS: Goody Ann, will you bring her up? Mrs. Putnam exits.
HALE: How did she call him?
ABIGAIL: I know not—she spoke Barbados.”(Miller, The Crucible pg.62)
Analysis (A):
This quote shows how when Abby was blamed of doing a bad deed she immediately says that Tituba is guilty of the action not her. Tituba is a black disempowered woman. Abigail is blaming someone with no power and influence so there is no way she can be blamed. It is wrong of her and the afflicted girls to blame disempowered people for selfish games. It is the exact definition of scapegoating. “Scapegoat: a person who is blamed for the wrongdoings, mistakes, or faults of others, especially for reasons of expediency.” (google dictionary) Abigail scapegoats Tituba to gain power but in the process abuses the privilege and becomes selfish. Abigail dehumanizes and marginalizes many women in the process of her selfish games. She makes many women suffer and treats it as a sport. It is entirely made up and it’s all fantasy. Abby and the afflicted girls scapegoated many people and not only ruined their lives they ruined their families lives. They scapegoated lots of people and treated as a harmless game.
Concluding/ Transition (C):
Abby scapegoated many people for no reason for greed, power and attention. As they say history repeats itself because nearly two hundred years later Joseph McCarthy did the exact same thing.
____________________________________________________________________________________
Paragraph #3: McCarthy/Red Scare Thematic Connection
Topic Sentence (T):
Joseph McCarthy scapegoated many innocent people during the second Red Scare in an effort for more power.
Explanatory Sentence (E):
Joseph McCarthy blamed many people by ruining or ending their lives in a selfish effort for more power. He held no suspicions of certain people who he believed were communists and told the world that he did for more power and attention. The following quote explains that he had no list and was falsely accusing people.
Evidence (E):
“McCarthy’s charge that hundreds of Communists held jobs in the U.S government shocked the nation. But almost immediately after the speech he changed his claim that 205 communists worked for the state department. In Denver, Colorado the second stop on his speaking tour, he told reporters he had a list of 207 people considered to be “bad risks” when reporters asked to see the list, McCarthy said he left it in his other suit which was still on the plane. In fact, McCarthy did not have any list. He was Basing his claims on a letter the had been written more than three years earlier.” (Fitzgerald, McCarthyism, pg.42)
Analysis (A):
McCarthy had no list of communists. He had a phony list he never had with him. His changing of claims was just evidence enough. He had no set number because there was barely any communist and even he didn’t know that. He was scapegoating innocent people and marginalizing them for no reason. There was rare case like the Rosenberg’s where Julius was a real russian spy. But we didn’t even learn that till a few years ago. He was a scapegoat and blamed people falsely for no reason all of the time. He falsely accused people consecutively for nine years. Joseph McCarthy was a scapegoating greedy, powerful, cruel senator. He scapegoated so many people for no reason. A little bit for him to get attention, but mostly for no reason. Joe was a man who would stand at nothing in his way for him to get attention and to succeed.
Concluding/ Transition (C):
Joseph McCarthy blamed many people in an effort for more power and attention just like Donald does today by scapegoating Muslims.
__________________________________________________________________________
Paragraph #4: Modern Day Witch Hunt Thematic Connection
Topic Sentence (T):
Donald Trump scapegoats many innocent muslims in our country in an effort for more power.
Explanatory Sentence (E):
Donald Trump banned many muslim people from entering the country to prevent muslim terrorism. Though in the past many years there has been no terrorist activity in those countries. And in the country’s there has been terrorist activity Mr. Trump has business in. So he doesn’t ban those countries to keep business with them.
Evidence (E):
“I hereby proclaim that the entry of nationals of Syria as refugees is detrimental to the interests of the United States and thus suspend any such entry,” the order signed by Trump reads.
The total number of refugees admitted into the United States would also be capped during the 2017 fiscal year at 50,000, down more than half from the current level of 110,000.
“I am establishing new vetting measures to keep radical Islamic terrorists out of the United States of America,” Trump said during the signing at the Pentagon after the swearing-in of Defense Secretary James Mattis. “We don’t want them here.” (As said by Donald Trump on CNN)
Analysis (A):
Donald Trump is scapegoating Muslim people especially from certain countries such as Syria, Somalia, Libya, Iraq, Iran, Yemen, and Sudan. Though he says banning these countries in an effort to end islamic terrorism there has not been any terrorism whereas countries such as Saudi-Arabia where there has been a frequent amount of terrorism he is not banning. Also Trump has had lots of business in Turkey, Saudi, Azerbaijan, and Egypt. Also he claims he doesn’t want those Muslims here but what is the difference between those Muslims and the ones in Turkey? Oh I know, you have business with the ones in Turkey, Mr. Trump. He is being a hypocrite he says Muslims don’t belong and that they are terrible though he still stays allies with his Muslim business partners. He is scapegoating many Muslims because of their religion. What does he have against them. What does he hate about them. I don’t know why you would discriminate against a large group of people because of their beliefs. He is scapegoating them for no reason it is false accusations.
Concluding/ Transition (C):
Donald Trump scapegoats many people for no reason and in an effort for more power. Just like Abby did in the 1700’s and like Joe McCarthy did in the 50’s. History really does repeat itself.
__________________________________________________________________________
Paragraph #5: Concluding Paragraph (ROC)
Reflection on Thesis (R):
All throughout America’s history people have done horrible wrongdoings by scapegoating. People with authority misuse their power for their own gain. But in the process they hurt lots of others.
Overview of Main Points (O):
All throughout history people have scapegoated people for their own gain. In the different unfortunate instances where innocent people have been scapegoated, people have been falsely accused and have stereotyped lots of innocent people.
Concluding Idea (C):
If people can begin to realize that they are ruining people’s lives maybe they would stop scapegoating and realize what they were doing was wrong. Because even if it was for their own gain maybe they will realize that their actions are a scandal. If they are to be found out they will go down in history as a terrible person. Just like Joseph McCarthy, Abigail Williams and Donald Trump. They have done horrible deeds by scapegoating so hopefully you learned something. Don’t let people scapegoating innocent people control you. Be the generation that ends irrational scapegoating, it comes with a cost.
The outline template is very helpful to create a first part of an essay because it is easy to know what you are doing and what part you are on without getting confused. You can sometimes forget what you were doing and the order and mix everything up and the template keeps everything in check. I think my experience with the template was less complicated because I knew more of what I was doing but other than that it was about the same experience. I think the format is very helpful and it makes a lot sense and it flows and works well. I like the format and hope to continue working with it in the future.
Ecology Action Project- Phytoplankton
My Colonial Research Paper and Rubric
Mathematical Similarity Summary
Mathematically similar similar when they have a true proportion. You can find out of 2 figures are similar using ratio. To do this you find out the ratio of the 2 figures and cross multiply them. If the 2 answers you get are the same you know that they are similar. You can also find out if figures are similar using scale factor. A scale factor is a number that you can use to multiply the sides of a figure to get the corresponding side of a similar figure. Another way to tell if figures are similar is seeing if they have a similar shape and the corresponding angles have to be congruent.
True or False any 2 rectangles are similar? The answer is FALSE. Not all rectangles share a scale factor. An example is that one rectangle could be 7 by 10 and another could be 3 by 4. There is no scale factor between these two rectangle which means that they are not similar. Though all rectangles share angles and same general shape it does not mean they are similar.
True or False any two equilateral triangles are similar? The answer is TRUE. All of the angle are 60 degrees so that works, all of the sides are the same size so that works and because all of this the ratio of the corresponding sides will be the same.
Good vs bad notes
This is bad notes because their is not much information and it is no to clear and has no header of title
Bad notes:
This is good notes because their is a clear heading on top with date and their is lots of clear information with diagram and it is very informing
Good notes: