Jack Trowbridge – Critical Reflection #2 (Week 1)

Describe a moment and analyze: “Write about a single experience or moment, and ask: how does this moment, experience, or encounter relate to my essential question?” You can also compare it with learning experiences you have had elsewhere, whether in or out of a classroom, at LREI, or elsewhere.

 

Current Essential Question: How can I use my knowledge of American civics/politics/law to inspire others to think more critically about current events?

What exactly is gerrymandering? This is a question that I have heard many times. From classmates. From my parents. From YouTube commenters confused at the seemingly undemocratic nature of U.S. politics. 

I often wondered the same thing before these last few days of research. But even after my roughly eight hours of research, I don’t think I fully understood the extent of the topic until my dad and I became expert gerrymander-ers.

In my research, I had found an activity from Cambridge University designed to teach gerrymandering in a hands-on way. It included a square-shaped “state” made up of 64 smaller squares, with each representing an equal number of Democratic or Republican voters. Our job was to divide the state into eight congressional districts with eight voters each.

From there, my dad and I gave ourselves an objective (eg. give as many congressional seats as possible to Republicans) and gerrymandered the state accordingly. 

We started by doing some math: the state contained 30 Republican squares and 34 Democratic squares. If each district would have eight voters, then the lowest number of voters a party needed to win the seat was 5. And because 30 divided by five equals six, the most number of Republican seats was six, assuming each candidate wins five to three. This would leave 16 extraneous Democratic voters to take up the remaining two districts.

We then employed the strategies of “packing” (shoving as many opposition voters into a few districts to dilute the power of opposition voters elsewhere) and “cracking” (drawing a border to slit up a powerful opposition voting bloc). After a lot of tinkering and starting over, we came up with this map:

Afterward, my mother walked in, not knowing what we were doing, and said, “look how cool, it’s so red!” I immediately thought, “no, not cool! We just disenfranchised a quarter of the state!” It was only after I had done it myself that I realized the truly destructive potential of gerrymandering. 

Last week, I wrote about the “how” of my essential question—that my project is as much about my presentation methods as it is about the actual content. I think Cambridge’s activity is a prime example of that “how” done correctly. It forces students to confront the feeling of having an immense amount of political power, and that’s not something any Powerpoint presentation or research assignment can capture.

3 thoughts on “Jack Trowbridge – Critical Reflection #2 (Week 1)

  1. I think the hands-on approach is something that I’ve always noticed lacking in the few times I’ve learned about gerrymandering. It’s a concept that can, in my opinion, only really begin to be understood when people try it themselves. I’ve watched countless videos in humanities classes with interesting graphics where the narrator shows me a gerrymandering example, but I still have a hard time understanding it. I really like the hands-on activity that you wrote about and showed.

  2. The game seems like such a great way to help students understand gerrymandering because of how engaging it is! I remember when I first really learned about gerrymandering in Ann’s Voting and Election’s behavior class. I thought it was great to have both a mix of reading and playing a similar game as you did. The way you incorporated both into your understanding I think is great and really allowed you to understand the issue.

  3. Fascinating to see the parallels between my project about learning methods and your own about gerrymandering and teaching. After employing a more kinesthetic, visual, and hands-on approach to digesting information you understood your own content in a more nuanced way. These types of “breakthroughs” in learning can be incredibly influential for students who struggle to understand certain concepts – because I can certainly empathize with Gwen, after continuously trying to learn about gerrymandering through different ways I always felt even more confused than when I had initially started. Amazing work!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *